Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:25
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
States With the Most Generous Tippers - Newser
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Hegseth moves to rename Navy ship honoring gay rights icon Harvey Milk - The Washington Post
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What Your Sweat Could Reveal About Your Health - CNN
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Rare Red Sprite Photographed in Tibet Dazzles Social Media - PetaPixel
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
PlayStation Plus new free game is the service's first 'AAAA' - GAMINGbible
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Oil rallies as Russia-Ukraine tensions offset OPEC+ output hike - Investing.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How does Google Gemini 2.0 work?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?